Comparer les modèles

Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GLM 5.2

A metric-by-metric comparison using the latest available benchmark, runtime, and pricing values. Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) wins more comparable metrics.

Ouvrir tous les benchmarks Créateur de comparaisons

Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback): 2
GLM 5.2: 0
Ties: 0
Metrics compared: 12

Comparer les modèles

Metric	Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)	GLM 5.2
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index	59,9	51,1
Artificial Analysis Coding Index	76,5	68,8
LiveBench Mathematics	96%	n/a
GPQA	92,6%	n/a
Humanity's Last Exam	53,3%	n/a
SciCode	60,2%	n/a
Output Speed	70,4 tok/s	n/a
Time to First Token	58,28 s	n/a
Blended Price	20,00 $US / 1M	n/a
Input Price	10,00 $US / 1M	n/a
Output Price

Données et preuves

Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)

Anthropic

Open model profile

GLM 5.2

Zai

Open model profile